1B Order Description Complete Policy Advocacy Challenge 1.6 (Jansson, p. 28) A PBS documentary, titled “Unnatural Causes,” discusses how our

1B Order Description Complete Policy Advocacy Challenge 1.6 (Jansson, p. 28) A PBS documentary, titled “Unnatural Causes,” discusses how our health is powerfully shaped by social and economic determinants, such as our social class and our level of education. View a four-minute segment of this documentary by going to https://www.pbs.org/unnaturalcauses/video_player.htm?hourone For more information about how the social environment and existing policies affect health care, scan this Robert Wood Johnson report Overcoming Health ObstaclesPreview the documentView in a new window and the Executive Summary Required Texts: Jansson, B. S. (2014). Becoming an effective policy advocate (7th ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole/Wadsworth. ISBN-13: 978- 1-285-06407-9 Then answer the following questions. 1. What evidence suggests that social-economic factors are often more important than genes in shaping differences in the health of low income persons and persons of color as compared to relatively affluent persons of Caucasian background? 2. What kinds of social and economic factors shape health outcomes and why? 3. Will expansion of health coverage, such as in national health insurance, end these “health disparities”? 4. Why are low income persons of color often less likely to follow healthy lifestyles, such as through diet and exercise, as compared to more affluent persons of Caucasian background?

Narrative Intervention. – on the novel, “Of mice and men” Dissertation Essay Help
Narrative Intervention. – on the novel, “Of mice and men”Order Description You are to demonstrate your understanding of the novel ‘Of Mice and Men’ including your understanding of characters, themes, social context and narrative style – by intervening at some point in the text. However instead of filling in a gap or silence, you must choose a crucial point in the text and create a new direction for the story. Whilst you are able to alter the events of the story, you must continue the third person narrative and position your readers to particular understandings about the identities, concepts, times and places in the novel. have decided to do the I ntervention when Lenny accidently kills the farmers son’s wife and runs away.

Discuss 4:1: Examining a sample memo (WA#3) from a previous student in wrtg 394___________________Please examine the sample memo. (The memo
Discuss 4:1: Examining a sample memo (WA#3) from a previous student in wrtg 394___________________Please examine the sample memo. (The memo can be found in Week 4 Content or under the Content heading “Sample Papers for WRTG 394.”)Then answer the following questions:1. What is the problem at her company that the student is addressing? Does her literature review (WA#2) inform this problem at all?2. What primary research does she want to conduct? 3. Would you recommend any other forms of primary research for her? For example, would interviews be helpful? If so, interviews with whom? Would a focus group be helpful? If so, a focus group with whom?4. Why will the primary research be important to her Human Resources Director, Joyce Smith? Why wouldn’t Ms. Smith be satisfied with simply studies and articles on employee retention and turnover?Discuss 4:2: Preparing a Research Report ProposalThis discussion will enable you to plan for the third writing assignment. For this discussion, you will propose some problem you wish to solve, either in the workplace or your community, a target audience—specifically the decision-maker that you will eventually write to—and some primary research you would like to do. Be sure to read the complete directions for more details. Provide feedback for at least one classmate’s answers.NOTE: This is not your third writing assignment. This is a discussion topic that is designed to help prepare you for the third writing assignment.For this discussion topic, please respond with a paragraph in which you describe the topic you are proposing, the audience (the decision maker(s) mentioned above), and some primary research you may wish to do.

Do the elements of thought, as described by Drs. Paul
Do the elements of thought, as described by Drs. Paul

Now that we have a look at what Heidegger sees as the importance of the
Now that we have a look at what Heidegger sees as the importance of the question of Being, it is evident that he has some concern for the ‘limits’ of Being in a number of different domains. Ultimately though, we are Beings-Towards-Death, and Heidegger fee Paper details: Type of Essay – Journal. The journal should briefly portray the above Topic about Heidegger, the philosopher . No in citations needed.Put only one source at the end. TEXTBOOK : Existentialism: Basic Reading [Charles Guigon

Improving Communication Competence Purpose of the Paper All of us, no matter how learned or skilled in the field of
Improving Communication Competence Purpose of the Paper All of us, no matter how learned or skilled in the field of communication, still experience problems communicating interpersonally with others to some degree, so we need to find ways to increase our competence as communicators. By completing this paper I hope you will gain both confidence and ability to more effectively deal with interpersonal communication problems in the future. Specifics of the Paper In this paper, you will: (1) describe an aspect of interpersonal communication that you recognize as being an area of needed improvement for yourself, (2) use theories and concepts from our textbook and/or class lectures to analyze why you might encounter some of the communication problems that you experience, (3) again, using theories and concepts from reading and/or online lectures, describe an action plan for improving communication competence in that area that you’ve discussed. Selecting a Topic Area One way to proceed with this paper is to think of situations where you find it difficult to engage in communication or to achieve your communication goals. For example, maybe you find it difficult not to compete during interpersonal conflict, maybe you’re just not sure how to disclose feelings in a relationship that is important to you, or maybe you don’t know how to effectively listen to a child or parent. Another suggestion is to make notes of topics discussed in your text with which you can personally identify. For example, after reading the text you may realize that you use language in unconventional ways, possibly in detrimental ways. Or, after reading about nonverbal communication, you realize that you misinterpret a friend’s facial expressions a great deal. Format of the paper Each paper should be 3 – 5 pages long. Headings, title pages, and works cited pages do NOT count toward your page count. Paper should include an introduction, body, and conclusion. Each paper should include documentation of your source(s) – at a minimum, you should cite our textbook. The paper should be double-spaced the paper with 12 point Time New Roman font.

Medical legal and ethics 1.) Compare and contrast “ethics”, “laws”, and “morals”. Why do we study ethics? 2.) I often
Medical legal and ethics 1.) Compare and contrast “ethics”, “laws”, and “morals”. Why do we study ethics? 2.) I often talk of ethics in the following way… “The solutions to today’s ethical dilemmas are not as important to today’s issues as they are to the unforeseen issues that will arise in the future as a result of those decisions of today.” What do you think I mean by this? Give an example of an ethical decision of the past that has caused more ethical dilemmas we face today. The following information is not supported by your course professor or Western Carolina University. This discussion is to explore current topics in medical ethics. ALL VIEWS ARE WELCOME AND IMPORTANT AS LONG AS WRITTEN SCHOLARLY AND WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHERS IN THE COURSE AND PROFESSOR. Initially you will be moved to respond out of emotion… please refrain from responding so quickly. Take some time to react emotionally, but then think about the situations intellectually. Dr. Peter Singer, a Princeton University Bioethicist, has caused great controversy in his ideas on infanticide and abortion. It should be noted that, in the halls of higher learning at the academically famous colleges and Universities around the world he has great support. The following opinions are paraphrased from his two books, Rethinking Life and Death (1996) and Practical Ethics (1980). Dr. Singer argues that humans are the only animal species where it is not considered “socially acceptable” to terminate the lives of their young if either the young is not “healthy” enough to survive on its own or the parents (for lack of a better word) feel incapable or unwilling to raise the off-spring. In his argument, he states that it is his opinion that an “infant” is not a person because it lacks the characteristics necessary for personhood; “rationality, autonomy, and self-consciousness (Singer, 1980).” He goes on to say, “killing a newborn is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living (Singer, 1980).” His position is that the child has no sense of self, no opinion of living or dying, and is not able to survive on its own. Dr. Singer believes that abortion should be legalized and morally permissible, as well as infanticide(which is euthanasia of an infant until the age of 2). He feels that these should be permissible if the parent(s) do not wish to take on the parental responsibilities, the fetus or infant is deemed unhealthy, or the parents have the feeling that raising the child would be socially, financially, or physically detrimental to the parent(s) or family units well-being. The child, in Dr. Singer’s view, is incapable of having an opinion or drive to live on its own. He believes that its level of personhood is not significant enough to outweigh the parent’s desire for termination:(a) the parents understand the difficulties in raising a child, (b) parents have an appreciation of the physical or mental pain involved for either parent or child in light of a terminal or debilitating illness (if that is the reason for the desire to terminate the life), or (c) an “insignificant life” is not more important than the adult choice to not be a parent. Of course, he cites added reasons to support his views as the anticipated decline to the number of families living in poverty, the drop in the number of homeless and malnourished living on our streets and in our shelters, and a decrease the overall numbers of children causing overcrowding in schools and government assistance programs as a result of the drop in population. Questions (3a) Given this first part of an overview of Dr. Singer’s views (yes, there is more to come), what do you think of his ideas and why? Please remember to be educated in your response, as well as emotional (if you must)? (3b) Do you agree or disagree that there might be a possible “improvement” to the economy and the numbers of those on governmental assistance programs?? Dr. Singer has been known to talk about how expensive health care is and the sad state of the Unites States’ organ transplant program. He argues in his books and teachings, and correctly I might add (only in the following statement), that many individuals die waiting on organs to become available. He also points out that these people are often on governmental assistance programs for their health and home care needs. Dr. Singer’s solution is quite simple… There are THOUSANDS of terminally ill or disabled children with life expectancies less than 5-10 years of age. Singer argues that if the government is paying for the children to receive care (and by care meaning medications, health care costs, home health support, etc.) through the end of their short lives, then the government should be allowed to keep a database of transplant information for each. If a match is found that makes them a good candidate for donating organs to someone on the transplant registry, the government should have the right to harvest those organs needed for transplant into another individual whom the government is ALSO paying for care (medications, hospital and health care costs, and home health support, etc.). He argues that the government is paying to “care and keep alive” TWO SETS of individuals who are not going to survive long in their present conditions. One group (the transplant recipient) could survive and even thrive on their own (without governmental dollars or contributing any longer to the high cost of medical care) if the organs are received from the younger donor. He questions why should the government (your tax dollars) pay for two groups of people when they could significantly reduce the total number of those being supported by using the terminally ill children to heal the others who just need an organ? Dr. Singer also says that it is quite probable that the overall cost of health care would go down to reasonable levels due to the decrease in dollars needed to be recovered by the government from tax payers like you and I. Questions (4a) What do you think of Dr. Singer’s views and why? (4b) Looking at the situation from an economical level, knowing the cost of health care and the cost of governmental programs to support these two sets of patients, does his questioning hold any validity? (4c) He argues that the government should have a “right” to those organs since the government is fitting the bill… But, how does that play into consent issues of the parents? Should they have a say? Why or why not?

Within the Discussion Board area, write 600–800 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments.
Within the Discussion Board area, write 600–800 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. As you close your weekly meeting with Deborah, she says, “There are some very good ideas here. I would like to see you continue with a global marketing plan. We need more concrete analysis and data for the presentation. Get your team to work.” After your meeting with Deborah, you briefly meet with your team to discuss moving toward a more formal analysis. “Tiffany and Mike, we need to provide a more detailed analysis,” you explain. “You’ve done a great job so far looking at what resources we need and potential countries, but we need to really dig deeper on this.” Tiffany nods her head in agreement. “Definitely,” she says. “We need to look at some internal variables as well as political, environmental, sociocultural, and technological environments of the countries that we are considering.” Mike interjects, “Well, that’s something we should consider, but it’s not the only way to analyze this type of project. This is such a big decision, and we need to give as much information as we can.” You reply, “Great point, Mike. We should look at this from a couple of different angles.” You go back to your office to update the project schedule with Deborah’s instructions. You review the activities and note the project remains on schedule. The next task in your strategic marketing plan is to determine the tools that are needed to conduct an analysis of the industry and competitors. Complete the following: What are the best tools to use in this situation? Provide a brief summary of at least 2 of these tools. Why do you think these are the best ways to analyze the market? How will you use these tools in your plan? The materials found in the M.U.S.E. may help you with this assignment, such as the audio file Implementing a Global Strategy. This file provides real-world experience that may help you with this assignment. Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions: What did you learn from your classmate’s posting? What additional questions do you have after reading the posting? What clarification do you need regarding the posting? What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings? For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

• Research Strategies Scoring Guide.• APA Style and Format. • Riverbend City Missions | Transcript. Review the two segments “Data
• Research Strategies Scoring Guide.• APA Style and Format. • Riverbend City Missions | Transcript. Review the two segments “Data Gathering” and “Needs Assessment” from the Riverbend City Missions media. These segments follow the Ruby Lake neighborhood after the chemical spill and the city’s efforts to identify what this neighborhood and its residents need to move forward. Now, answer the following questions for this assignment. Support your statements and positions on the answers using references to the scholarly literature. Be specific with your answers, using examples to clarify. 4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of these research strategies? What information led you to decide the strengths and weaknesses? 5. To what degree do you believe the strategies lend themselves to an accurate needs assessment of the Ruby Lake neighborhood? 6. In what ways would the changes you suggested in question 1 improve the results? Would you have designed the needs assessment in the same way? Why or why not? Other Requirements Your paper should meet the following requirements: • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. • Number of resources: Include 3–5 scholarly references. • Length of paper: 5–7 typed, double-spaced pages. • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.